Clarkson’s Farm

Author
Discussion

thatsprettyshady

1,837 posts

166 months

Saturday 4th May
quotequote all
I like the running joke about him not being about to control his bloody dogs hehe

Evanivitch

20,234 posts

123 months

Saturday 4th May
quotequote all
2 GKC said:
That was utterly insincere. If he wanted to keep Pepper he would have done. 5 minutes later he was talking about chopping pigs up. It’s entertaining viewing but is becoming increasingly contrived.
Same of farmers the world over.

The bets bill for that one piglet was massive. But no such effort was made for the other piglets born in the cold (see the piggies thread were you'd have a suitable barn space for the piglets if you're naive enough to have a glut of piglets arriving in cold weather.

UTH

8,997 posts

179 months

Saturday 4th May
quotequote all
I can’t quite remember from the previous series, why do the council have such an issue with pretty much everything he’s trying to do?

Evanivitch

20,234 posts

123 months

Saturday 4th May
quotequote all
UTH said:
I can’t quite remember from the previous series, why do the council have such an issue with pretty much everything he’s trying to do?
Because he's tried to get everything approved retrospectively, because of his famed lack of knowledge on anything...

Smollet

10,665 posts

191 months

Saturday 4th May
quotequote all
Evanivitch said:
Until she ultimately gets a massive fine for selling tat in the farm shop laugh
A mate has an Irish wife and she has trouble grasping technicalities of law. Thinks it doesn't apply to her and if does today then it won't tomorrow rofl

FiF

44,226 posts

252 months

Saturday 4th May
quotequote all
Evanivitch said:
UTH said:
I can’t quite remember from the previous series, why do the council have such an issue with pretty much everything he’s trying to do?
Because he's tried to get everything approved retrospectively, because of his famed lack of knowledge on anything...
In the first series there was a comment by land agent Cheerful Charlie that maybe it wasn't so much a case of the council didn't want the developments but that they didn't want Jeremy to do the developments.

Once you get that into your head, be it right or wrong, it takes something to avoid a "right hold my beer" moment.

From the other side , interview with the poor devil who has been his local Councillor until yesterday.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/tv/0/the-councillor-wh...

Evanivitch

20,234 posts

123 months

Saturday 4th May
quotequote all
FiF said:
In the first series there was a comment by land agent Cheerful Charlie that maybe it wasn't so much a case of the council didn't want the developments but that they didn't want Jeremy to do the developments.
I'm sure there's a good amount of that *because* he tried to do everything retrospectively.

Sway

26,346 posts

195 months

Saturday 4th May
quotequote all
Evanivitch said:
FiF said:
In the first series there was a comment by land agent Cheerful Charlie that maybe it wasn't so much a case of the council didn't want the developments but that they didn't want Jeremy to do the developments.
I'm sure there's a good amount of that *because* he tried to do everything retrospectively.
I don't believe he did do everything retrospectively. Aiui, for some of the developments there's stated exemptions from planning for access tracks, etc. - yet the council decided they didn't apply (counter to all of Charlie's experience) and that planning would be required.

FiF

44,226 posts

252 months

Saturday 4th May
quotequote all
Sway said:
Evanivitch said:
FiF said:
In the first series there was a comment by land agent Cheerful Charlie that maybe it wasn't so much a case of the council didn't want the developments but that they didn't want Jeremy to do the developments.
I'm sure there's a good amount of that *because* he tried to do everything retrospectively.
I don't believe he did do everything retrospectively. Aiui, for some of the developments there's stated exemptions from planning for access tracks, etc. - yet the council decided they didn't apply (counter to all of Charlie's experience) and that planning would be required.
Agreed, happened by accident to catch a series 1 episode and it was that the application had gone in, and any work being discussed both Charlie and the builders were adamant the work was permitted.


Funk

26,327 posts

210 months

Saturday 4th May
quotequote all
Evanivitch said:
2 GKC said:
That was utterly insincere. If he wanted to keep Pepper he would have done. 5 minutes later he was talking about chopping pigs up. It’s entertaining viewing but is becoming increasingly contrived.
Same of farmers the world over.

The bets bill for that one piglet was massive. But no such effort was made for the other piglets born in the cold (see the piggies thread were you'd have a suitable barn space for the piglets if you're naive enough to have a glut of piglets arriving in cold weather.
Most of those died either because their mothers rolled over on them or in the case of Baroness because they were too weak to be viable. Also, I suspect the reality of it was that it was 'lesson learned' in that you can't spend £600 a time trying to save piglets that are unlikely to survive... I also don't think they were expecting it to still be so cold come March when the piglets were due.

Evanivitch

20,234 posts

123 months

Saturday 4th May
quotequote all
Funk said:
Most of those died either because their mothers rolled over on them or in the case of Baroness because they were too weak to be viable. Also, I suspect the reality of it was that it was 'lesson learned' in that you can't spend £600 a time trying to save piglets that are unlikely to survive... I also don't think they were expecting it to still be so cold come March when the piglets were due.
Snow isn't unusual up until April. And as Kaleb mentioned, the crushing was related to the conditions.

I feel like the lessons learned were somewhat the result of not taking an amateur approach when better resources and facilities were available.

I'm not by any means suggesting the vets bill was the right way forward, that was simply the case of a "farm-pet" syndrome.

Edited by Evanivitch on Saturday 4th May 14:49

SydneyBridge

8,674 posts

159 months

Saturday 4th May
quotequote all
Rather unfortunate relying on a certain female prime minister (at the time) for business inspiration

Funk

26,327 posts

210 months

Saturday 4th May
quotequote all
SydneyBridge said:
Rather unfortunate relying on a certain female prime minister (at the time) for business inspiration
You could tell he was taking the piss..! rofl

Mikebentley

6,160 posts

141 months

Saturday 4th May
quotequote all
Smollet said:
Evanivitch said:
Until she ultimately gets a massive fine for selling tat in the farm shop laugh
A mate has an Irish wife and she has trouble grasping technicalities of law. Thinks it doesn't apply to her and if does today then it won't tomorrow rofl
We were watching it going that’s just like my brothers wife. She has very creative views on regulations and rules (laws to the rest of us). She is the same age as Lisa, even looks like her and is Oirish.

Turn7

23,686 posts

222 months

Saturday 4th May
quotequote all
Evanivitch said:
2 GKC said:
That was utterly insincere. If he wanted to keep Pepper he would have done. 5 minutes later he was talking about chopping pigs up. It’s entertaining viewing but is becoming increasingly contrived.
Same of farmers the world over.

The bets bill for that one piglet was massive. But no such effort was made for the other piglets born in the cold (see the piggies thread were you'd have a suitable barn space for the piglets if you're naive enough to have a glut of piglets arriving in cold weather.
Thats the part that got me, its middle of winter, get a genny down there and have a heat lamp in each arc with piglets in.
That wouldnt stop the ancient issue of sows lying on the young and crushing them,altho there are ways making things a little safer for them.

Ive worked with Pigs and enjoyed it. They are way more intelligent than Sheep, whos sole mission is to die as swiftly as possible.
They are also very similar in character to dogs, and add the cuteness of a piglet, it does make it a little sad to see the mortality rate.

SydneyBridge

8,674 posts

159 months

Saturday 4th May
quotequote all
Just watched the first four and many emotions but just absolutely superb

Edited by SydneyBridge on Saturday 4th May 20:42

DSLiverpool

14,785 posts

203 months

Saturday 4th May
quotequote all
Charlie is a bloody genius, there is nothing he doesn’t know.

Evanivitch

20,234 posts

123 months

Saturday 4th May
quotequote all
Turn7 said:
Thats the part that got me, its middle of winter, get a genny down there and have a heat lamp in each arc with piglets in.
That wouldnt stop the ancient issue of sows lying on the young and crushing them,altho there are ways making things a little safer for them.
Heat lamp behind crush bars isn't complicated stuff, is it? Especially as there was a gap between the first and second liters.

I like the numbers game, it's good for the public to see the upfront costs that have to be taken on before harvest.

Doofus

25,968 posts

174 months

Saturday 4th May
quotequote all
"Jeremy, will you get on her back please, and I'll fetch the biscuits."

rofl

Skodapondy

300 posts

49 months

Saturday 4th May
quotequote all
Did the size of The Pigloos help or hinder the piglet issues? I don't mean Baroness and her litter with that, but they seemed small to me. On the other hand The Dogs make me laugh.